Les « Monuments français inédits » (1806-1839) de N.-X. Willemin et la découverte des « Antiquités nationales »
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reference works which marked their day and were improvements over what previously existed are normally taken for granted, eventually forgotten. The in part posthumous work of N.X. Willemin in selecting and publishing the ‘National Antiquities’ of France, is one of the earlier and more important histories of the arts on a comparative method, treating works front the sixth to seventeenth centuries as documents of the historical evolution of society. The art works discussed were not only in the leading Parisian and provincial museums and libraries, but from outstanding private collections as well, so the Monuments français inédits is the result of a complex series of relations between scholars, editors, collectors and dealers in the transitional period between Revolution and Restoration. Their identification and the characterization of their activities will provide scholars with a more secure foundation for further research in the early Romantic period which is as yet poorly documented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it