Family determination of formation of health-saving behavior of adolescents in the process of their professional self-determination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of determining the socio-psychological conditions for the formation of healthy behavior of adolescents in the family are presented. The study of socio-psychological characteristics in schoolchildren’s families, the nature of relationships with parents, the causes of family conflicts, as well as self-assessment of the causes of adolescents’ own behavior girls) of secondary school age of general secondary education institutions in 6 regions of Ukraine. It has been established that almost a quarter of the surveyed middle-aged teenagers are brought up in a single-parent family. An important socio-psychological feature of the formation of healthy behavior of modern adolescents is the presence of problems in family communication and the lack of trust between parents and children. For 74 % of surveyed students, parents are the main source of knowledge about health, 63.9 % of students consider it necessary to change something in their own behavior and habits to improve their health, 67.1 % — find useful information about health behavior. The family is an extremely important and influential source of forming a healthy lifestyle for children. However, almost half of the adolescents surveyed have problems communicating with their parents. Negative prerequisite for the complex process of becoming a healthy personality of a modern adolescent in the process of his professional self-determination are family conflicts, the use of punishment, misunderstanding by parents of children, lack of sufficient parental attention and support of the child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".