MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RapidRider: Efficient WiFi Backscatter with Uncontrolled Ambient Signals

2021· article· en· W3156100202 on OpenAlexaff
Qiwei Wang, Si Chen, Jia Zhao, Wei Gong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoodputDemodulationComputer scienceBackscatter (email)Decoding methodsThroughputOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)Phase-shift keyingNetwork packetSymbol (formal)Real-time computingWirelessBit error rateComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents RapidRider, the first WiFi backscatter system that takes uncontrolled OFDM WiFi signals, e.g., 802.11a/g/n, as excitations and efficiently embeds tag data at the single-symbol rate. Such design brings us closer to the dream of pervasive backscatter communication since uncontrolled WiFi signals are everywhere. Specifically, we show that RapidRider can demodulate tag data for each OFDM symbol while previous systems rely on multi-symbol demodulation. Further, we design deinterleaving-twins decoding that enables RapidRider to use any uncontrolled WiFi signals as carriers. We prototype RapidRider using FPGAs, commodity radios, and USRPs. Comprehensive evaluations show that RapidRider's maximum throughput is 3.92x and 1.97x better than FreeRider and MOXcatter. To accommodate cases where there is only one receiver available, we design RapidRider+ that can take productive data and tag data on the same packet. Results demonstrate that it can achieve an aggregated goodput of productive and tag data around 1 Mbps on average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207