MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156153476 · doi:10.7202/1076120ar

Voyeurisme et impasse morale dans l’oeuvre de Pascale Kramer

2021· article· fr· W3156153476 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tania Collani

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes françaises · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La vue est un sens très sollicité dans l’oeuvre de la romancière franco-suisse Pascale Kramer née à Genève en 1961 : plus spontanée que le regard, la vue survole une multitude de scènes intimes et rechigne à en prendre conscience. Les personnages des romans de Kramer sont des spectateurs passifs de tableaux sociaux variés, frappés par tout type de pulsion (scopique, érotique, de répétition) et victimes de précarité morale. Les oeuvres publiées par Kramer depuis vingt-trois ans, de Manu (1995) à Une famille (2018), constituent une mise en scène stylistiquement savante du voyeurisme contemporain, dans laquelle les personnages (et les lecteurs avec eux) sont condamnés à une suspension de leur jugement éthique. En ayant recours à Derrida, Freud, Jankélévitch, Lipovetsky, Pontalis et Vaneigem, notre étude montre, chez Kramer, l’inconstance du paradigme « voir c’est savoir », ainsi que sa poétique délibérée de l’impasse morale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes françaisesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207