Quand la revitalisation urbaine dévitalise la marge sociale juvénile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compte tenu des enjeux entourant la revitalisation urbaine des centres-villes, nous formulons l’hypothèse selon laquelle les dispositifs de contrôle associés au contexte de revitalisation du centre-ville-est de Montréal précariseraient davantage le processus de sortie de la rue chez les jeunes qui désirent fuir la menace d’enfermement de la rue. Le discours économique valorisant le développement d’activités et de décors projetant des apparences de prospérité encourage la dispersion et l’évacuation des jeunes de la rue, ces derniers diffusant par leur simple présence des prégnances de décadence urbaine. La répression systématique de la marge sociale juvénile contribuerait à restreindre les possibilités pour ces jeunes d’éprouver pleinement l’expérience de l’autonomie sociale et, conséquemment, d’élaborer un projet de sortie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".