MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156216427 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.10482

Kingston's Inner Harbour: Belle Island to Anglin Bay

2018· article· en· W3156216427 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ashley-Elizabeth Best

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarbourPoeticsPoetryMode (computer interface)BiotopeEcologyBaySociologyHistoryAestheticsArchaeologyLiteratureArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My project is an ecopoetic inquiry of Kingston's Inner Harbour. It contains several poems and photographs. The Inner Harbour provides an interesting case study of the intersections between industry, history and ecological preservation. This project evolved from an eco diary assignment in which I actively decided to consider the poem an environmental form that moves beyond the limitations of descriptive aesthetics to lived experiences of ecological processes. It forced me to re-evaluate my relationship with this particular biotope, and how to destabilize an ingrained human-centred mode of thinking and interacting with the environment. Ecological poetics extends beyond describing or being about nature, and aims to provide a deeper engagement with the environment. This research connects with my book, Slow States of Collapse, in regards to my approach to poetry as an open-ended dialogue that can adopt many forms and styles to illustrate lived experiences. Language, in this case poetry, can play an important role in ecological understanding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207