Report on First and Second ACM/IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for CAD (MLCAD)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ACM/IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for CAD (MLCAD) was held on September 2–4, 2020 in Canmore, AB, Canada. The location at the entrance to Banff National Park maintained a long tradition of mountain locations for technical meetings ( <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Figure 1</xref> ). The workshop welcomed 52 participants including eight graduate students. The program committee was cochaired by Hussam Amrouch of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Bei Yu of Chinese University of Hong Kong. General Chairs were Marilyn Wolf and Jörg Henkel. The program included 30 contributed presentations based on submissions to the program committee as well as five invited talks. The program included talks from both industry and academia; participants were based in Asia, Europe, and North America. The program provided time for in-depth discussion; topics included appropriate types of ML methods for various types of CAD problems and challenges associated with training data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it