MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156271732 · doi:10.51249/gei.v1i01.50

POLITICAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF INFORMATION SECURITY IN THE MODERN WORLD

2020· article· en· W3156271732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSecurity, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsPoliticsState (computer science)Political scienceNational securityOrder (exchange)CybercrimeInternational securityInformation securityLaw and economicsSociologyLawComputer securityBusinessComputer scienceThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of the current political and legal foundations of information security and comparison of its different historical stages have proved that many factors directly affect this process. They include inter-state historical relations and the world order, the struggle of various countries and regions for resources, the development of information and communication technologies, as well as the self-awareness of people. The authors of the article have concluded that information security lays the basis for state security in general and increases its power. The level and nature of communication between countries and their blocs are determined by the ability to influence each other through a system of propaganda and communication routes, including goods, services, the education system, scientific studies and social networks. Cybercrime can be combatted not only through toughening political and legal restrictions but also through forming a global humanitarian approach to human values, which is ensured by the education system, the exchange of universal cultural values and the formation of new human qualities. The political and legal foundations of modern information security are as follows: historical relations between various states and regions; the current world order as the leading factor in forming the concept of information security; the power of each state and its role in the international security system as a political actor; the nature and development of information society in each region of the world; a set of international laws and treaties regarding the use of information, its preservation and disposition; the legal framework of each state; general trends in the formation of the global information space and its features associated with information and communication technologies. Information can work to the benefit only if different countries and regions cooperate since their interdependence grows each year, including in the sphere of information support. To obtain these results, system analysis of the legal framework of economic security, both in individual countries and internationally, as well as an abstract logical analysis of the practice of making political decisions to ensure information security were used. The rules and guidelines of information security, described in the scientific literature, as well as applied in practice in individual countries, have been studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it