DEM modeling of one-dimensional compression of sands incorporating statistical particle fragmentation scheme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel framework of modeling crushable granular materials under mechanical loadings based on the discrete element method (DEM). The framework is featured with the construction of the one-to-one model in which every particle in a physical experiment has its own numerical twin and allows the modeling of irregular shaped fragments during the continuous breakage process. First, image processing techniques and spherical harmonic (SH) analysis were adopted, respectively, to segment and label particles and to construct a one-to-one model mathematically in DEM. Then, a particle crushing criterion based on the maximum interparticle contact force was used to predict the crushing events, showing fitting results that agreed very well with a large number of single particle crushing tests. Next, a statistical approach for the generation of particle fragmentation modes of a given type of sand particles based on the principal component analysis (PCA) was proposed. The aim of the PCA was to analyze the statistical trends of the coefficient matrix, which was composed of the SH coefficients of all the particles involved in the analysis. Finally, a successful modeling of a particle crushing event was achieved by replacing the particle, which was judged by the crushing criterion to undergo crushing, with a few subparticles chosen randomly from a specific fragment template constructed using the microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".