MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3156412945

Classification of Respiratory Physiology with Airwave Oscillometry using Multi-layer Perceptron

2020· dissertation· W3156412945 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPrincess Margaret Hospital Foundation
KeywordsRespiratory physiologyPerceptronMedicineRespiratory systemComputer scienceNeurosciencePsychologyArtificial intelligenceInternal medicineArtificial neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airwave Oscillometry(OSc) is a novel pulmonary function test with the advantages of effort independent operation and high sensitivity to heterogeneous lungs over conventional tests. However, OSc results are high dimensional without well-established interpretation guideline, posing challenge for clinician’s understanding and limiting its clinical utility. While recent advances in Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), a machine learning model that has proven capability of complex pattern recognition and classification, this thesis proposed to automate OSc output classification using MLP. We have compared the performance of MLP classifying OSc patterns with different number of hidden layers, investigated the effects of training sample size and input selection on the performance of the classification. The classification performance varied with training-validation division and output categories. We found that MLP with hidden layers outperformed MLP without hidden layer and the highest validation accuracy was 82% for binary classification of respiratory physiology with OSc data using a 2-hidden-layer MLP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→