Bateaux, plateaux, arsenaux : quels enjeux géopolitiques dans un Arctique en mutation ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trois grandes controverses, bien différentes, opposent les pays de l’Arctique. Tout d’abord se pose la question du statut des routes maritimes potentielles des Passages du Nord-ouest et du Nord-est, alors que des scénarios y prévoient un accroissement de la navigation. Ensuite se pose la question de l’extension de la souveraineté économique sur les plateaux continentaux, au-delà de la ligne des 200 miles marins, et des litiges frontaliers que les chevauchements pourraient susciter. Enfin, alimentées par le souci des États arctiques d’asseoir leur contrôle sur les espaces maritimes qui se libèrent des glaces, les politiques de sécurisation que plusieurs d’entre eux mènent apparaissent parfois comme une militarisation de l’Arctique, en particulier pour la Russie et, un temps, pour le Canada. Ces trois controverses diffèrent tant de par les enjeux que du fait de jeux d’alliances changeants. Mais ces phénomènes traduisent-ils réellement un emballement des enjeux géopolitiques pour l’Arctique ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".