Rencana Umum Energi Daerah dalam Perspektif Implementasi Filosofi Tri Hita Karana dan Visi Pemerintah Provinsi Bali
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed at reviewing and providing perspective concerning how the Balinese local genius of Tri Hita Karana and the vision of Bali could be implemented in the Regional Energy General Plan (RUED) of Bali Province. This study used the descriptive qualitative method with causal inference concluding technique. The data were collected from the process of drafting, consulting, discussing, and stipulating Regional Regulation No. 9 of 2020 concerning RUED of Bali Province 2020-2050. The finding showed that there is a significant and strong relationship of the implementation of Tri Hita Karana and Bali Vision on the RUED of Bali Province to maintain the balance and harmony among the humans, nature, and Balinese culture as the primary tourist destination in Indonesia which highly depending on the attractiveness of its culture and natural environment. There are new things in terms of its management strategy as the evaluation result of some pilot projects in implementing new and renewable energy in Bali Province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it