MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156495763 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.9942

L’éternité de la maternité : une analyse de la relation mère-fille dans Tout comme elle de Louise Dupré

2018· article· fr· W3156495763 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachel Albert, Michelle Hudon, Sadie Vanier

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La relation mère-fille est une relation unique et universelle. C’est une relation qui évoque à la fois deux femmes individuelles et met en lumière des éléments positifs et négatifs, éléments qui permettent aussi de réfléchir à ce que c’est que d’être une femme. La pièce de théâtre Tout comme elle de Louise Dupré, publiée en 2006, remet en question les valeurs féminines et maternelles. Celle-ci nous emporte notamment dans le domaine de la douleur et de l’universalité de la féminité, ce que nous analyserons à partir des actes III et IV de la pièce. Ces derniers nous encouragent à poser la question suivante, à savoir comment la relation mère-fille fait preuve de permanence, malgré les obstacles qu’elle peut rencontrer. Nous répondrons à cette question en explorant la fonction de la distance, ce qui nous renverra alors à l’idée de la totalité du temps. Enfin, nous monterons comment cette pièce valorise le cycle de la féminité. En effet, ce sont les mères et les filles qui rendent possible la survie des êtres humains. Et cette présentation montrera par conséquent l’aspect éternel de la relation mère-fille à travers cette œuvre québécoise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.287
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207