MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156596155 · doi:10.1109/tia.2021.3074109

Analysis and Design of Series LC Partial-Resonance-Pulse-Based ZCS Current-Fed Push-Pull Converter

2021· article· en· W3156596155 on OpenAlexafffund
Swati Tandon, Akshay Kumar Rathore

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSnubberCommutationVoltageTopology (electrical circuits)Computer sciencePulse-width modulationRLC circuitConvertersElectronic engineeringResonance (particle physics)Current sourceElectrical engineeringVoltage sourceCapacitorEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes a partial-resonance-pulse, created through a series LC resonant circuit, on the current-fed push-pull converter topology to achieve the zero-current-switching (ZCS) of the semiconductor switches. During switching overlap of the semiconductor switches, referred to as energy storage mode, the resonance occurs and offers the natural commutation of the semiconductor devices. During this period, the current is smoothly transferred from one switch to the other and the outgoing switch commutates naturally with ZCS. It solves the historical problem of the voltage spike across the devices at their turn-off and thus, eliminates the requirements of the snubber across switches or the clamping circuit. This reduces the hardware complexity and makes the converter snubberless, compact, and cost-effective. The variable frequency with constant switching overlap time is adopted for the load voltage regulation and to maintain the ZCS of the devices for a given range of source voltage and load current. A comprehensive study of the steady-state operation and analysis of the proposed topology is reported along with the design and selection of the resonant tank elements. A hardware proof-of-concept prototype rated at 500 W is developed and tested to validate the analysis and claims and demonstrate the converter performance. An efficiency of 96.2% is recorded in a laboratory on the prototype at full load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207