MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156611693 · doi:10.4095/328196

Felt reports and damage accounts for the 1925 moment magnitude 6.2 Charlevoix, Quebec, earthquake

2021· report· en· W3156611693 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maurice Lamontagne, K. B. S. Burke, P Archambault, L Olson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoment magnitude scaleMagnitude (astronomy)SeismologyMoment (physics)GeologyRichter magnitude scaleEarthquake magnitudePhysicsMathematicsGeometryAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 28 February 1925 magnitude 6.2 Charlevoix Earthquake occurred at 9:19 p.m. local time. The epicenter was beneath the St. Lawrence River in the Charlevoix-Kamouraska area. The shock was felt at more than 1000 km from the epicenter. In the following weeks, dozens of aftershocks continued to shake the area, keeping residents on both sides of the St. Lawrence River on high alert. Damage was reported on both sides of the River in the epicentral zone, as well as in the cities of Québec and Shawinigan. In these areas, chimneys and masonry buildings proved particularly sensitive to the ground vibrations. The 1925 earthquake is one of five known moment magnitude 5.5-7 events that have occurred in the Charlevoix Seismic Zone (CSZ) between 1663 and present. This Open File Report presents the macroseismic information and its ratings on the Modified Mercalli Scale for a total of more than 600 locations in Canada and some 180 in the United States (from NOAA). This report builds on the macroseismic information published in Cajka (1999) and adds descriptive information for each locality where damage occurred. For each location, the felt information is rated on the Modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) scale and tabulated in a Microsoft Excel sheet. Numerous images of clippings of newspaper articles are included and the descriptive text is added to the database. In addition, photographs of the earthquake damage are included. The Open File also provides a GoogleEarth kmz file that allows the felt information reports to be viewed in a spatial tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207