MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156622712 · doi:10.22146/jp2m.51199

Pendampingan Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Usaha Milik Desa, Desa Sidoharjo, Kecamatan Samigaluh, Kabupaten Kulon Progo

2021· article· id· W3156622712 on OpenAlexaff
Ihda Arifin Faiz, Faiz Zamzami, Dina Natasari, Rizky Wulandari

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian dan Pengembangan Masyarakat · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness administrationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Program pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk menguatkan pengelolaan keuangan dan tata kelola Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) Binangun Mandiri Desa Sidoharjo Kecamatan Samigaluh Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Bidang usaha yang dijalankan oleh BUMDes adalah jasa keuangan dan perdagangan alat tulis kantor. Metode pengabdian yang digunakan adalah melalui pelatihan dan pendampingan selama periode waktu pengabdian yang melibatkan berbagai pemangku kepentingan desa, termasuk perangkat desa dan masyarakat luas. Program pengabdian ini dapat meningkatkan kapasitas dan kemampuan sumber daya manusia pengelola pada aspek keuangan BUMDes. Pengelolaan BUMDes yang baik merupakan salah satu aspek penting penguatan kemandirian masyarakat desa dengan berpijak pada pemanfaatan potensi lokal dalam upaya untuk memecahkan permasalahan masyarakat, terutama aspek perekonomian. Dari tiga indikator tata kelola BUMDes yang baik tampak bahwa BUMDes Binangun Mandiri Sidoharjo memiliki pengelolaan yang baik dengan didukung aspek struktural, finansial dan sosial yang baik. Keberadaan program pengabdian ini memperkuat aspek tata kelola keuangan yang ada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian dan Pengembangan MasyarakatSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207