Tauroursodeoxycholic acid/TGR5 signaling promotes survival and early development of glucose-stressed porcine embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conditions of impaired energy and nutrient homeostasis, such as diabetes and obesity, are associated with infertility. Hyperglycemia increases endoplasmic reticulum stress as well as oxidative stress and reduces embryo development and quality. Oxidative stress also causes deoxyribonucleic acid damage, which impairs embryo quality and development. The natural bile acid tauroursodeoxycholic acid reduces endoplasmic reticulum stress and rescues developmentally incompetent late-cleaving embryos, as well as embryos subjected to nuclear stress, suggesting the endoplasmic reticulum stress response, or unfolded protein response, and the genome damage response are linked. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid acts via the Takeda-G-protein-receptor-5 to alleviate nuclear stress in embryos. To evaluate the role of tauroursodeoxycholic acid/Takeda-G-protein-receptor-5 signaling in embryo unfolded protein response, we used a model of glucose-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Embryo development was impaired by direct injection of tauroursodeoxycholic acid into parthenogenetically activated oocytes, whereas it was improved when tauroursodeoxycholic acid was added to the culture medium. Attenuation of the Takeda-G-protein-receptor-5 precluded the positive effect of tauroursodeoxycholic acid supplementation on development of parthenogenetically activated and fertilized embryos cultured under standard conditions and parthenogenetically activated embryos cultured with excess glucose. Moreover, attenuation of tauroursodeoxycholic acid/Takeda-G-protein-receptor-5 signaling induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress and cell survival genes, but decreased expression of pluripotency genes in parthenogenetically activated embryos cultured under excess glucose conditions. These data suggest that Takeda-G-protein-receptor-5 signaling pathways link the unfolded protein response and genome damage response. Furthermore, this study identifies Takeda-G-protein-receptor-5 signaling as a potential target for mitigating fertility issues caused by nutrient excess-associated blastomere stress and embryo death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".