MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156837387 · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100777

Study protocol for DICE trial: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication versus interventional radiology guided chest tube insertion for the management of empyema

2021· article· en· W3156837387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecorticationMedicineEmpyemaChest tubeThoracostomySurgeryRandomized controlled trialVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgeryThoracotomyThoracoscopyCardiothoracic surgeryPneumothorax

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Empyema is a common thoracic surgery presentation, defined as pus in the pleural space. Despite the commonality of empyema, consensus on initial management remains ambiguous. Two standard of care treatment options include inserting a chest tube (thoracostomy) and the administration of intrapleural fibrinolytics, or an initial surgical approach, surgical decortication. Due to the complexity of this pleural space infection, often repeat interventions are required after initial management in order to achieve source control and resolution of clinical symptoms. This study aims to identify the most effective initial management option for empyema. STUDY DESIGN: We present a study protocol for a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing adult individuals with empyema to one of two standard of care initial management options. Participants will be randomized into either interventional radiology guided chest tube insertion with intrapleural fibrinolytics (Dornase 5 mg and Alteplase 10 mg intrapleural twice daily for three days) or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication. METHODS: All adults with empyema meeting inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. They will be randomized into one of two intervention groups; interventional radiology guided chest tube insertion with fibrinolytics or initial VATS decortication. Each intervention will take place within 48 hours of randomization. The primary outcome will be the rate of re-intervention within 30 days. Re-intervention is defined as repeat chest tube insertion, VATS decortication, or decortication via thoracotomy. Secondary outcomes include a change in the size of empyema, length of stay, morbidity, as well as 30-day and 90-day mortality, as well as quality of life measurements. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: This study is aimed at identifying the most effective initial management option for individuals with empyema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.775
GPT teacher head0.603
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it