MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156908205 · doi:10.18174/533764

Monitoring grondgebondenheid melkveehouderij : 2018-2019

2020· report· nl· W3156908205 on OpenAlexaff
H.J. Silvis, P.W. Blokland, C.H.G. Daatselaar, H.H. Luesink, Martien Voskuilen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagenl
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toen de Algemene Maatregel van Bestuur Grondgebonden melkveehouderij op 1 januari 2016 van kracht werd, verkeerde de Nederlandse melkveehouderij in een expansiefase. Naar aanleiding van de groeiende mestproductie kondigde de overheid in juli 2015 de invoering van fosfaatrechten voor de melkveehouderij aan. Voordat dit stelsel per januari 2018 daadwerkelijk werd ingevoerd, zijn in 2017 via het fosfaatreductieplan ingrijpende maatregelen getroffen om de melkveehouderij onder het nationale sectorplafond van de fosfaatproductie te brengen. De genoemde ontwikkelingen hebben hun weerslag gehad op de grondgebondenheid van de melkveehouderij in de periode 2015-2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207