MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156915015 · doi:10.1115/1.4050899

Explicit Algebraic Reynolds-Stress Modeling of Pressure-Induced Separating Flows in the Presence of Sidewalls

2021· article· en· W3156915015 on OpenAlex
Abdelouahab Mohammed-Taifour, Julien Weiss, Louis Dufresne

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsMechanicsReynolds stressTurbulenceReynolds numberShear stressBubbleAdverse pressure gradientBoundary layerMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approach is used to simulate the steady-state of a family of pressure-induced turbulent separation bubbles in the presence of sidewalls. Different turbulence models are employed with a specific emphasis on the baseline explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model (BSL-EARSM) and the simulations are compared with experimental data. The separation and reattachment of a flat-plate turbulent boundary layer are generated through a combination of adverse and favorable pressure gradients (APG-FPG) by numerically reproducing the geometry of the wind-tunnel test section used for the experiments. Three cases are considered a large (LB) and a medium (MB) bubble presenting mean backflow, and a small bubble (SB) without mean-flow reversal. This is achieved by varying the streamwise position of the APG/FPG transition. Good agreement between the BSL-EARSM-computed solutions and the experimental results are obtained for wall-pressure and skin-friction distributions on the centerline plane of the test section as well as for the overall three-dimensional flow topology. However, both detachment and reattachment are predicted too early and the bubble length is slightly overestimated for cases LB and MB. For case LB, the streamwise Reynolds stress is estimated fairly well but its production is somewhat delayed. Normal and shear stresses are in good agreement with the experiments in the upstream part of the bubble but are significantly over-estimated in the reattachment region. The k−ω shear-stress transport (SST) model with the so-called reattachment modification performs better than the other tested linear-eddy-viscosity models but it is still unable to reproduce accurately the three-dimensional flow topology even for the “simplest” case SB. Overall, the results suggest that BSL-EARSM is the most suitable turbulence model for this flow configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it