MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156986090 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.10053

3. The Possibilities and Implications of Policy Strategies to Integrate Aviation Biofuels into Transoceanic Commercial Canadian Jet Aircrafts

2018· article· en· W3156986090 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Joshua Goodfield

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAviationAviation biofuelContext (archaeology)Commercial aviationLegitimacyBusinessBiofuelInternational tradeEngineeringPolitical scienceGeographyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aviation is a rapidly growing industry and transportation method in today’s globalized world. Due to Canada’s widespread metropolis areas across its large landmass, there is an increasing demand to offer international flights to support recreational travel and commerce. This project assesses the current emissions created through Air Canada’s flights that deliver passengers to and from South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Through the data this project contains, Canadian policymakers can better understand the trends of the industry to best predict how more sustainable second-generation biofuels can be utilized to enact positive environmental change. The shift towards green aviation is progressing at very different rates throughout the world. However, as the environmental movement gains governmental legitimacy, contemporary innovators are beginning to challenge the ways in which carbon emissions can be effectively minimized. Canada has a clear lack of policy that makes biofuels, in the context of aviation, appear to be more of an idea instead of a practical solution. Various regions of the world have differing policies regarding how their governments and industry prioritize sustainable aviation. There are market-based policy approaches and mechanisms that Canada may choose to implement that would dictate the future of Canada’s growing aviation sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0110.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesFrench-language works237,207