MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157003965 · doi:10.52722/pcej.v2i1.118

Tinjauan Perencanaan Spillway Bendungan Karalloe di Kabupaten Gowa

2020· article· id· W3157003965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePaulus Civil Engineering Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpillwayPhysicsHydrology (agriculture)ForestryGeographyGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini membahas tentang tinjauan perencanaan Spillway pada proyek Bendungan Karalloe. Spillway tersebut berfungsi untuk mengalirkan air yang berlebihan dari bendungan agar tidak terjadi overtopping pada bendungan kembali ke sungai. Digunakan tiga metode dalam perhitungan analisa curah hujan yaitu Metode Gumbel, Log Pearson Tipe III, dan Log Normal. Debit banjir rancangan dianalisis menggunakan Metode Hidrograf Satuan Sintesis Gama-I. Perencanaan Spillway direncanakan berdasarkan perbedaan debit banjir rancangan dan tipe mercu Spillway. Hasil penelitian ini didapatkan debit banjir rancangan sebesar 613,251 m3/det dan tinggi energi di atas mercu sebesar 2,902 m dengan menggunakan tipe mercu bulat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it