Cavity Detection in Steel-Pipe Culverts Using Infrared Thermography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finding efficient and less expensive techniques for different aspects of culvert inspection is in great demand. This study assesses the potential of infrared thermography (IRT) to detect the presence of cavities in the soil around a culvert, specifically for cavities adjacent to the pipe of galvanized culverts. To identify cavities, we analyze thermograms, generated via long pulse thermography, using absolute thermal contrast, principal components thermography, and a statistical approach along with a combination of different pre- and post-processing algorithms. Using several experiments, we evaluate the performance of IRT for accomplishing the given task. Empirical results show a promising future for the application of this approach in culvert inspection. The size and location of cavities are among the aspects that can be extracted from analyzing thermograms. The key finding of this research is that the proposed approach can provide useful information about a certain type of problem around a culvert pipe which may indicate the early stage of the cavity formation. Becoming aware of this process in earlier stages will certainly help to prevent any costly incidents later.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".