MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157072608 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab072.711

713 Sleep of infants and toddlers during 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic

2021· article· en· W3157072608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gita Gupta, Louise O’ Brien, Louis T. Dang, Renée A. Shellhaas

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and SafetyOffice of Research and Development
KeywordsMedicineToddlerLogistic regressionPediatricsDemographyQuarter (Canadian coin)PandemicPsychologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Developmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction SARS-CoV-2 changed the lives of children and their parents in 2020. To our knowledge, no studies have examined infant and toddler sleep during this pandemic. We sought to compare parent-reported sleep characteristics of infants and toddlers over successive quarters of the past year. Methods Parents of children aged 0–36 months were surveyed primarily in the Midwestern USA between 01/17/2020 and 12/07/2020. Each parent responded only once. Age was categorized as: <6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, and 24–36 months. Income was categorized as: <$50,000, $50-100,000, $100-150,000, and >$150,000. The year was divided into quarters. Multivariable linear regression included Total Sleep Time (TST), Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) and parental frustration with sleep (any frustration, scale of 1–5) as dependent variables and year quarter, child’s age, prematurity, child’s comorbidities, maternal age (during their child’s birth), parenting experience, household income, and room sharing as independent variables. Logistic regression included nap consistency (napping at the same time daily) as the dependent variable, and year quarter, child’s age, prematurity, comorbidity, maternal age, parenting experience, household income, and room sharing as independent variables. Results Of 594 children, mean age was 18.5±9.7 months and 52% were female. Prematurity and comorbidities were reported for 8% and 15%, respectively. Mean maternal age was 31.8±4.5 years. Neither TST (β=-0.488; p= 0.16) nor SOL (β= 0.029; p=0.23) were associated with year quarter. SOL was 3 minutes less for each increase in income category (β =-0.051; p= 0.003). TST (β = -0.994; p<0.001) and SOL (β =0.092; p<0.0001) were most associated with child’s age. Parental frustration was associated with child’s age (β=0.12; p= 0.04), comorbidity (β=0.30; p=0.05) and room sharing (β= -0.38; p=0.006), but not year quarter. Nap consistency was associated with increased child age category (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.13, 1.94) and lack of room sharing (OR=2.09; 1.10, 3.97), but not year quarter. Conclusion Parent-estimated TST, nap consistency and sleep-related frustration did not differ significantly over the first 12 months of the pandemic. Yet, our results underscore that special attention should be given to the sleep of infants and toddlers with comorbidities, who share a room, and who have a lower household income. Support (if any) 2T32HL110952-06

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207