MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157085623 · doi:10.1002/uog.22427

VP07.03: Preferences of women and their partners regarding access to and use of non‐invasive prenatal tests in Québec, Canada

2020· article· en· W3157085623 on OpenAlexaffabout
C Vincent, Luisa Kunz, Emilia Kostenko, François Drolet, M. Almendro Delia

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrenatal screeningPregnancyFamily medicineTest (biology)DemographyObstetricsGynecologyPrenatal diagnosisFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) have been available in Canada since 2012. Currently, NIPT is publicly covered for high-risk pregnancies (as a second-tier test) in the provinces of Ontario, British Columbia and the Yukon Territory; other patients who desire NIPT must pay out of pocket and/or fund through private insurance. The objective of this study was to survey pregnant and soon-to-be-pregnant women and their partners, to assess their motivations and preferences regarding NIPT use and coverage by the public health insurance system. A web-based survey was conducted between July 12-25, 2019 among Québec residents. A total of 760 subjects from four groups were surveyed: pregnant women (n = 250), their partners (n = 126), women wishing to become pregnant in the next five years (n = 258), and their partners (n = 126). Although most individuals surveyed (82%) felt their risk of giving birth to a child with Down's syndrome was low, the vast majority (93%) valued knowing their risk of fetal aneuploidy as early in pregnancy as possible. Of the 88% of respondents who intended to request NIPT during pregnancy, the most commonly cited motivations were decrease in stress and the possibility of making an informed decision on the continuation of pregnancy. Almost all of the respondents (94%) believed public funding should cover the cost of NIPT. In Québec, the vast majority of expecting parents and couples who wish to have a baby in the near future desire aneuploidy screening with NIPT even though they self-identify as low-risk. They value knowing their screening result early in pregnancy and feel NIPT will enable them to make an informed decision and reduce their anxiety. There is a notable discrepancy between the risk status of the population who feels will benefit from NIPT (low-risk) and current public funding plans in Canada, which only cover NIPT for high-risk pregnancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207