MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157097025 · doi:10.24193/ekphrasis.24.9

Adrift in History, Who Is This One?: Art in the Critical Zone

2020· article· en· W3157097025 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Ramsay

Bibliographic record

VenueEkphrasis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropoceneEnvironmentalismAestheticsNarrativeSociologyEnvironmental ethicsHistoryArtLiteraturePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the capacity of art for representing the question of ecological grief now confronting us in the Anthropocene.My art work is an ongoing series of drawings and paintings of dead birds entitled "Adrift in History."In reflecting on the meaning of this artistic practice through environmental narrative and art as a complex site of productive experimentation, I place the experience of grief-regarding both human and animal mortality in our rapidly diminishing environment in the Anthropocene-on display and for interpretation within multiple modalities.This project brings together art, literature, poetry, psychology, philosophy, phenomenology, environmentalism, cultural ecology, anthropology, ornithology, and naturalism to frame the cycle of life, death and transformation.My goal is to juxtapose an ecocritical theoretical lens with the art work to create a discursive intermedial effect-one that asks, reflexively, what the value might be of contemplating, while creating, an interspecies, archetypal image of the soul and its potential emotional resonance in the traumatic contemporary moment of the Anthropocene condition.In "Who Is This One?"-a recent suite in the series "Adrift in History"-I dwell on the image of the North American robin-Turdus migratorius-a common backyard species, and one of the many birds now facing great risk.So, I depict the robin at rest, contingently, in a state of limbo between life, death and the after-life.Influenced by Jon Young's environmental narrative, What the Robin Knows: How Birds Reveal the Secrets of the Natural World, and the ecocritical concept of strategic empathy, I represent what the robin might feel.I am interested in how such images-and their capacity to evoke sympathy in the system of affinities between the embodied human mind and the more-than-human world enfolding animals, nature, and the environment as interdependent forces-might contribute to efforts to move us through and beyond grief, toward active investment as answerable, and ethical agents of social change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.082
Scholarly communication0.0150.010
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEkphrasisSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207