MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single Channel QRS Detection Using Wavelet And Median Denoising With Adaptive Multilevel Thresholding

2020· article· en· W3157169017 on OpenAlexaff
Sudipta Modak, Luay Yassin Taha, Esam Abdel‐Raheem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingQRS complexArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceDiscrete wavelet transformWavelet transformNoise reductionNoise (video)Sensitivity (control systems)WaveletMedian filterSIGNAL (programming language)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer visionEngineeringImage processingElectronic engineeringImage (mathematics)MedicineTelecommunicationsCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of heartbeats in electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is very important to sustain good health. Any anomalies in the heart rhythm can be detected by carefully studying the ECG signal. The detection of the QRS is obstructed by external and internal sources of noise. Automatic detection of the QRS is achieved by diminishing these noises to a minimum by different types of filtering such as band-pass filtering, wavelet transform, and applying thresholds. This paper presents a new method of QRS detection using discrete wavelet transform (DWT), median filtering, and adaptive multilevel thresholding (AMT). The proposed method is tested for the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database and shows a high sensitivity of 99.74%, positive predictivity of 99.88%, and a detection error rate of 0.38%. In addition to this, the proposed technique is quite robust and can adapt to signals with a low signal-to-noise ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207