MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157193403 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1024

Electronic Health Record-Based Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis Identifies New Susceptibility Loci for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

2021· article· en· W3157193403 on OpenAlexaff
Nooshin Ghodsian, Erik Abner, Émilie Gobeil, Nele Taba, Alexis St- Amand, Nicolas Perrot, Christian Couture, Yohan Bossé, Patricia L. Mitchell, Marie‐Claude Vohl, Sébastien Thériault, André Tchernof, Tõnu Esko, Patrick Mathieu, Benoît J. Arsenault

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyMendelian randomizationSingle-nucleotide polymorphismFatty liverGenetic associationDiseaseGeneticsBiologyBioinformaticsMedicineGeneInternal medicineGenotypeGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent form of liver disease. Observational studies documented associations of NAFLD with several chronic and infectious diseases but whether these associations underlie causal effects is unknown. The molecular mechanisms and genetic architecture of NAFLD are poorly understood. Our objectives were to identify genetic loci associated with NAFLD and determine whether the presence of NAFLD was causally associated with human diseases. Methods: We created a NAFLD genetic instrument through the identification of independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with NAFLD in a meta-analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) (6715 cases and 682,748 controls). Using inverse-variance weighted Mendelian Randomization (MR), we investigated the impact of NAFLD on human disease-related phenotypes in the UK Biobank and FinnGen cohorts as well as in the COVID-19 host genetics initiative. Results: We first performed a GWAS meta-analysis of four cohorts and found variants significantly associated with NAFLD (p<5.0E-8) at six genetic loci (MTARC1, GCKR, TRIB1, LMO3, SUGP1 [TM6SF2] and PNPLA3). Using a risk factor informed Bayesian approach (bGWAS), we identify variants at three additional loci (LPL, FTO, and APOE). To determine if the association between NAFLD and human diseases shows evidence of causality, we performed MR across the human disease-related phenome (>800 diseases) using a genetic instrument for NAFLD. Results of these analyses suggest that NAFLD was not causally associated with diseases outside the spectrum of liver diseases. We also found no causal association between genetically predicted NAFLD and COVID-19-related outcomes. Conclusions: This study identified several new genetic loci associated with NAFLD. NAFLD was not causally associated with diseases outside those of the spectrum of liver diseases. This finding suggests that the resolution of NAFLD might not prevent other diseases previously associated with NAFLD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.009
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207