Multi-scale systems genomics analysis predicts pathways, cell types and drug targets involved in normative human cognition variation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An open challenge in human genetics is to better understand the link between genotype variation and the various molecular, cellular, anatomical and physiological systems that it can affect. To address this challenge, we performed genotype-phenotype-systems analysis for accuracy in nine cognitive tasks from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (3,319 individuals aged 8-21 years). We report a region of genome-wide significance within the 3’ end of the FBLN1 gene (p=4.6×10 −8 ), associated with nonverbal reasoning, a heritable form of complex reasoning ability. Integration of published brain-specific ‘omic maps reveals that FBLN1 shows greatest expression in the fetal brain, is a marker of neural progenitor cells, is differentially expressed in schizophrenia and increases genetic risk for bipolar disorder. These findings suggest that nonverbal reasoning and FBLN1 variation warrant further investigation in studies of neurodevelopmental disorders and psychosis. Using genotype-pathway analysis, we identify pathways related to development and to autonomic nervous system dysfunction associated with working memory accuracy. Top-ranking pathway genes include those genetically associated with multiple diseases with working memory deficits, such as schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease, and that are also markers for specific brain cell types. Our findings identify novel molecular players involved in specific cognitive tasks and link variants to genes, pathways, cell types, diseases and drugs. This work advances the “molecules-to-behaviour” view of cognition, and provides a framework for using systems-level organization of data for other biomedical domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".