Joint AP Association and PCS Threshold Selection in Dense Full-duplex Wireless Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joint access point (AP) association and physical carrier sensing (PCS) threshold selection has the potential to improve the performance in high density wireless LANs (WLANs) under high contention, interference and self-interference (SI) limited transmissions. Using tools from stochastic geometry, user and AP locations are independent realizations of spatial point processes. Considering the inherent effects of the channel access protocol, the spatial density of throughput (SDT), which depends on channel access probability and coverage rate, is derived as the performance objective. Leveraging spatial statistics of the network, a throughput-utility maximization problem is formulated to seek AP association and PCS threshold selection policies that jointly maximize SDT. The AP association and the PCS threshold selection policies are derived analytically while an algorithm is proposed for numerical solution. Under simulated scenarios involving full-duplex (FD) nodes, optimizing AP association yields performance gains for low to high node density in large-scale wireless networks. Considering PCS threshold selection optimization jointly with AP association is shown to improve performance by effectively separating concurrent transmissions in space. It is shown that AP association in FD WLANs groups users into minimal contention domains and PCS threshold optimization reduces the interference domain of user groups for additional performance gains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".