MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157386357 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.84

Business Relationships between Corporations and Distributors: A Study of Petroleum Business Law in Indonesia

2021· article· en· W3157386357 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Budi Santoso

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)BusinessPrincipal–agent problemIndonesianLawLaw and economicsIndustrial organizationFinanceEconomicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper aims to analyze the business relationship in LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) distribution and marketing in Indonesia as it has an important and strategic role for most Indonesian people. By using a juridical and empirical approach, the results showed that Pertamina is a state-owned company that assigns LPG duties to the end-user. To reaches the end-user needed by another intermediary, namely an agent. The legal relationship between Pertamina and the agent is stipulated in the agency contract. Form the theory side, it is necessary to research whether the agency contract is based on the basic principles of agency law or not. The incompatibility of an agency contract with the basic principles of agency law caused the contract not to have legal force. The contribution of this research is its examination of the legal validity of the agency contract of Pertamina with the agent and to provide a legal opinion from the agency theory side which should be the basis for making agency contracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207