MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157483907 · doi:10.1029/2020jc017017

Seasonal Cycle of the Coastal West Greenland Current System Between Cape Farewell and Cape Desolation From a Very High‐Resolution Numerical Model

2021· article· en· W3157483907 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ruijian Gou, Charlène Feucher, Clark Pennelly, Paul G. Myers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCapeOceanographyCurrent (fluid)MeltwaterSubmarine pipelineIcebergGeologyArcticSea iceClimatologyGeographySnowGeomorphologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The shelf based West Greenland Current System carries both Arctic Water and Greenland meltwater around Cape Farewell, the southern tip of Greenland, where it may impact the deep water formation in the Labrador Sea. Nevertheless, this current system remains largely unknown due to limited observations. Using a very high‐resolution (1°/60°) numerical simulation integrated from 2005 to 2014, the annual cycle of the current structure in the vicinity of southern Greenland is analyzed to present the seasonal variability of the West Greenland Current System. A distinct shelf break West Greenland Coastal Current (WGCC) exists for about half the year between Cape Farewell and Cape Desolation, although it merges with the main jet of the West Greenland Current (WGC) in winter and separates in summer. The WGC has three components at Juliannehaab Bight: A shelf component, a shelf‐break component and a main slope jet. The shelf system is most energetic in fall, when the freshwater transport is also the greatest in a range of 25–40 mSv, with a broad transport minimum in spring in a range of 15–25 mSv. The seasonal cycle is strongest near Cape Farewell and weakest at Cape Desolation. The strength of the shelf system decreases as one moves north as water is lost offshore, with strongest transports of 0.61 Sv to the east of Cape Farewell and weakest of 0.41 Sv at Cape Desolation. This decrease in transport between Cape Farewell and Cape Desolation suggests substantial exchange between WGCC and WGC in this region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207