Reactivation of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a Patient With COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Given COVID-19 rise in populations with high burden of tuberculosis infection, the interplay between COVID-19 and tuberculosis reactivation needs further investigation. We report a case of a 64-year-old man who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome due to severe COVID-19 infection. He was managed with intubation, prone-position mechanical ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide, and methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous twice daily for 5 days. He developed unexplained persistent fever and leukocytosis that failed to respond to empiric broad-spectrum antibacterial, antifungal agents, and a 3-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg for possible usual interstitial pneumonitis. His endotracheal aspiration samples tested positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis , and antituberculosis regimen was started. The patient died as result of decision to withdraw life support. This report establishes the clinical picture of a tuberculosis reactivation in a COVID-19 patient. The complex interaction between COVID-19, steroids, and tuberculosis is a clinical dilemma of great significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".