MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157519514 · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10109

Network Traffic Characterization Using (p,n)-grams Packet Representation

2014· dissertation· en· W3157519514 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdulrahman Hijazi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsHeaderComputer scienceNetwork packetTraffic classificationTraffic generation modelNetwork traffic controlDeep packet inspectionComputer networkTraffic shapingData miningDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the ever increasing advances in network protocols and traffic complexity, new challenges are emerging in traffic characterization and management.In this thesis, we propose a new approach that can complement existing ones with a simple high-level understanding of network traffic.Our approach uses (p, n)-grams representation to analyze network traffic, where a (p, n)-gram is an n-byte string starting at offset p.We argue that the (p, n)-grams representation combines the efficiency of using specific packet fields (e.g.ports) with the generalized pattern matching of n-grams, without the complexity and overhead of full packet pattern matching.We also show that using (p, n)-grams allows for traffic analysis at all packet parts (payload content, header port/flow, and other header behavior fields), without mixing between similar patterns that may accidentally exist at different fields within packets.As a proof of concept, we develop a (p, n)-gram-based lightweight unsupervised clustering algorithm (ADHIC) that makes no prior assumptions about the involved protocols.We show that ADHIC can automatically cluster network traffic using a binary decision tree into equivalence classes that closely approximate standard measures of network traffic.We also show that ADHIC can be used to monitor network traffic through observing the dynamic updates to the clustering tree.Those incremental updates highlight the temporal changes in network traffic that are not easily detected using standard network analysis methods.We then research the characteristics and distributions of (p, n)-grams in network packets, and how they can be utilized for traffic analysis.In particular, we argue that (p, n)-grams have automatic fingerprinting capability where a simple frequency ii analysis of network packets can capture structural (p, n)-grams based on their relative high frequencies.These (p, n)-grams represent protocol and sub-protocol structures and cross-protocol patterns.We observe that (p, n)-grams follow a power-law-like distribution where the structural ones constitute the rapidly-dropping-off curve before the long tail.We argue that this special distribution adds to the efficiency of (p, n)-grams-based traffic analysis as it describes structural (p, n)-grams as 1) a small set of (p, n)-grams that 2) can be easily distinguished from the long list.Our observation relies on a thorough empirical analysis using independent network traffic traces.In addition, we create an entropy-based conceptual model that explains this distribution behavior in the context of the hierarchy of network protocols and statistics of Internet traffic.iii Acknowledgment Dedicated to my dearest father, Abdullah Hijazi, dearest mother, Ameerah Deyab, and dearest wife, Nesrin Sarmini for their endless support and courage throughout this difficult journey.My father has been always the source of passion and enthusiasm to pursue this long path.My mother gave me the ideal example of dedication and determination.My wife made everything possible to provide the best working environment while raising our five little children. I would like to extend

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingFrench-language works237,207