MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157563463 · doi:10.4000/ephaistos.9020

Les trois racines de la statique graphique

2021· article· fr· W3157563463 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Phaïstos · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le début de la statique graphique est généralement associé aux travaux de l'ingénieur allemand Karl Culmann (1821-1881), avec son ouvrage Die Graphische Statik, publiés en huit volumes à Zurich en 1864-1866. Pourtant Culmann le souligne dans la préface de son œuvre : il a pris en compte les études conduites par les savants et ingénieurs qui ont ouvert le champ de la statique graphique, notamment Jean-Victor Poncelet (1788-1867), Barthélemy Cousinery (1790-1851), Jakob Steiner (1796-1863). Et, comme il le mentionne également, les origines de la statique graphique remontent bien avant. Dans cet article, nous présentons les trois fondements de la statique graphique : i) la composition et la décomposition des forces avec le polygone funiculaire ; ii) les stimuli venus des pratiques de construction ; iii) la dualité forme-force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-PhaïstosSame topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207