Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, we systematically studied the basic theory of Bregman circumcenters in another paper. In this work, we aim to investigate the application of Bregman circumcenters. Here, we propose the forward Bregman monotonicity which is a generalization of the powerful Fejer monotonicity, and show a weak convergence result of the forward Bregman monotone sequence. We also naturally introduce the Bregman circumcenter mappings associated with a finite set of operators. Then we provide sufficient conditions for the sequence of iterations of the forward Bregman circumcenter mapping to be forward Bregman monotone. Furthermore, we prove that the sequence of iterations of the forward Bregman circumcenter mapping weakly converges to a point in the intersection of the fixed point sets of relevant operators, which reduces to the known weak convergence result of the circumcentered method under the Euclidean distance. In addition, particular examples are provided to illustrate the Bregman isometry and Browder's demiclosedness principle, and our convergence result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it