MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157621523 · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00244-8

Cancer and COVID-19 vaccines: a complex global picture

2021· article· en· W3157621523 on OpenAlexafffund
Muhammed Aasim Yusuf, Diana Sarfati, Christopher M. Booth, C.S. Pramesh, Dorothy Lombe, Ajay Aggarwal, Nirmala Bhoo‐Pathy, Audrey Tieko Tsunoda, Verna Vanderpuye, Tezer Kutluk, Alice Sullivan, Deborah Mukherji, Miriam Mutebi, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Richard Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustMenzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of LondonScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEconomic and Social Research CouncilHomi Bhabha National InstituteFaculty of Medicine, American University of BeirutTata Memorial CentreQueen's UniversityHacettepe ÜniversitesiUniversiti MalayaNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAmerican University of BeirutCancer Research InstitutePfizerUniversity of WarwickKing's College London
KeywordsMedicineCancerPandemicVaccinationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopulationDisadvantagedFamily medicineGlobal healthPublic healthDiseaseEnvironmental healthInternal medicineEconomic growthVirologyPathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.015
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet OncologySame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207