MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157642136 · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102949

Ancient throwing dart reveals first archaeological evidence of castoreum

2021· article· en· W3157642136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kate Helwig, Jennifer Poulin, Valery Monahan, Christian Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Archaeological Science Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsYukon Department of Tourism and Culture
FundersUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks
KeywordsArchaeologyResidue (chemistry)ThrowingGeographyArtChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alpine ice patches were caribou and sheep hunting territories for southern Yukon First Nations people for thousands of years. With increasing global temperatures, well-preserved projectile weapons that were frozen for centuries are now melting out of the ice. The study of organic residues on recovered projectiles is part of a larger effort to learn about traditional hunting technology. Here we identify the residue on a recently recovered, 6000-year-old throwing dart as castoreum, harvested from the castor sacs of butchered beavers. FTIR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-GC-MS analysis of the residue indicated substituted phenols, phenolic dimers, coumarins and xanthenes as well as cholesterol derivatives and traces of protein. Comparative analysis of reference material extracted from the castor sacs of recently trapped beavers confirmed the identity of the residue as castoreum. This finding represents the earliest evidence of castoreum use in the fabrication of weaponry and the first chemical identification of this material in the archaeological record.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Archaeological Science ReportsSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207