A Prospective Single-Arm Study Evaluating the Effects of a Multimodal Physical Therapy Intervention on Psychosexual Outcomes in Women With Dyspareunia After Gynecologic Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dyspareunia affects most women after treatment for gynecologic malignancies. However, to date, evidence-based interventions remain limited and no study has examined the effects of multimodal physical therapy on psychosexual outcomes in these patients. AIM: To assess the effects of multimodal physical therapy on psychosexual outcomes including sexual distress, body image concerns, pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy and depressive symptoms in women with dyspareunia after treatment for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: Thirty-one gynecologic cancer survivors with dyspareunia enrolled in this prospective single-arm interventional study. The participants undertook 12 weekly sessions of physical therapy incorporating education, pelvic floor muscle exercises with biofeedback, manual therapy and home exercises. Outcome measures were evaluated pre- and post-treatment. Paired t-tests were conducted to investigate the changes from pre-treatment (P-value ˂ 0.05) while effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated to measure the magnitude of the change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual distress (Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised), body image concerns (Body Image Scale), pain anxiety (Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), pain self-efficacy (Painful Intercourse Self-Efficacy Scale) and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II). RESULTS: Significant changes were found from pre- to post-treatment for all psychosexual outcomes. Women reported reductions in sexual distress (P ˂ 0.001, d = 1.108), body image concerns (P ˂ 0.001, d = 0.829), pain anxiety (P ˂ 0.001, d = 0.980), pain catastrophizing (P ˂ 0.001, d = 0.968) and depression symptoms (P = 0.002, d = 0.636) with an increase in pain self-efficacy (P ˂ 0.001, d ≥ 0.938) following the intervention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results suggest that multimodal physical therapy significantly improves sexual distress, body image concerns, pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy and depressive symptoms in our sample of women with dyspareunia after treatment for gynecologic malignancies. The medium to large effect sizes obtained with the high proportion of women presenting meaningful changes according to the known minimal clinically important difference or clinical cut-off underlines the significance of these effects. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The current study used validated questionnaires to assess the psychosexual outcomes of a well-designed physical therapy intervention using multiple modalities to address the multifaceted aspect of dyspareunia in cancer survivors. This study did not include a control group, which may limit drawing definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION: Findings showed that multimodal physical therapy yielded significant improvements in psychosexual outcomes in gynecologic cancer survivors with dyspareunia. A randomized controlled trial is indicated to confirm these results. Cyr M-P, Dumoulin C, Bessette P, et al. A Prospective Single-Arm Study Evaluating the Effects of a Multimodal Physical Therapy Intervention on Psychosexual Outcomes in Women With Dyspareunia After Gynecologic Cancer. J Sex Med 2021;18:946-954.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".