MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157731204 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23129-5

Author Correction: DNA methylation predicts age and provides insight into exceptional longevity of bats

2021· article· en· W3157731204 on OpenAlexaff
Gerald S. Wilkinson, Danielle M. Adams, Amin Haghani, Ake T. Lu, Joseph A. Zoller, Charles E. Breeze, Bryan D. Arnold, Hope C. Ball, Gerald G. Carter, Lisa Noelle Cooper, Dina K. N. Dechmann, Paolo Devanna, Nicolas J. Fasel, Alexander V. Galazyuk, Linus Günther, Edward Hurme, Gareth Jones, Mirjam Knörnschild, Ella Zoe Lattenkamp, Caesar Z. Li, Frieder Mayer, Josephine A. Reinhardt, Rodrigo A. Medellín, Martina Nagy, Brian Pope, Megan L. Power, Roger D. Ransome, Emma C. Teeling, Sonja C. Vernes, Daniel Zamora-Mejías, Joshua Zhang, Paul A. Faure, Lucas J. Greville, Steve Horvath, L. Gerardo Herrera M., José Juan Flores‐Martínez

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLongevityDNA methylationComputational biologyBiologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article omitted from the author list the 34th author L. Gerardo Herrera M., who is from the ‘Estación de Biología de Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 48980 San Patricio, Mexico’ and the 35th author José J. Flores-Martínez, who is from the ‘Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico’. Additionally, the following was added to the Author Contributions: ‘L.G.H.M., J.J.F.M., M.N., B.P., M.L.P., R.D.R., E.C.T., S.C.V., G.S.W., and D.Z. provided or prepared samples’ in place of ‘M.N., B.P., M.L.P., R.D.R., E.C.T., S.C.V., G.S.W., and D.Z. provided or prepared samples.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207