MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157749480

The Philippine News Agency: Setting the Public Information Agenda After the Signing of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020

2020· article· en· W3157749480 on OpenAlexaff
Saludes Bantugan Brian, Jenny Sampole

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraming (construction)TerrorismAgency (philosophy)Political sciencePopulationPriming (agriculture)Regulatory agencyLawMedia studiesPublic administrationSociologySocial scienceGeographyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study conducted a mixed-method study of 44 articles on the website of the Philippine News Agency which are labeled as news reports. The articles, published a day after the Anti-Terrorism Act 2020 (ATA 2020) was signed by President Rodrigo Duterte, were downloaded from www.pna.gov.ph a week after. The total population of articles released on July 4, 2020, underwent content analysis, and the articles that were linked to the ATA 2020 were textually analyzed for Priming and Framing using the lens of Agenda Setting Theory. The study revealed that PNA did reverse-priming for ATA 2020 and that all articles on the latter served to frame it positively using public relations writing and not news writing standards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationFrench-language works237,207