MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157766568 · doi:10.11588/heidok.00029302

Boundary Distributions for GL3 over a Local Field and Symmetric Power Coefficients

2021· dissertation· en· W3157766568 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peter Gräf

Bibliographic record

VenueheiDOK (Heidelberg University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftConcordia UniversityDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsMathematicsBounded functionPure mathematicsHolomorphic functionPoisson kernelBoundary (topology)Poisson distributionHarmonic functionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we construct a residue map and a Poisson kernel between holomorphic discrete series representations on the Drinfeld period domain and harmonic cocycles with certain non-trivial coefficients on the Bruhat-Tits building for GL3 over a local field of any characteristic. In order to construct the Poisson kernel, we find a new locally analytic kernel function that can be integrated against general boundary distributions. Assuming the existence of certain boundary distributions attached to bounded harmonic \ncocycles, we prove that the Poisson kernel is a right inverse of the residue map for bounded harmonic cocycles. Moreover, we show that the existence of the needed boundary distributions follows from a non-criticality statement for a new class of automorphic forms. We prove a control theorem that implies this non-criticality statement for trivial coefficients. Finally, we apply our constructions to relate spaces of Drinfeld cusp forms for certain congruence subgroups of GL3 and spaces of harmonic cocycles extending work of Teitelbaum to GL3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueheiDOK (Heidelberg University)Same topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207