MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3157776446 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8148

Collisional Langevin approach to bed load sediment velocity distributions

2021· article· en· W3157776446 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Pierce, Marwan A. Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBed loadPhysicsRange (aeronautics)DragMechanicsLangevin dynamicsExponential functionTurbulenceContext (archaeology)Particle (ecology)Momentum (technical analysis)Langevin equationSediment transportInelastic collisionBrownian motionSedimentDissipationStatistical physicsClassical mechanicsGeologyMaterials scienceThermodynamicsNuclear physicsMathematicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bed load experiments reveal a range of possibilities for the downstream velocity distributions of moving particles, including normal, exponential, and gamma distributions. Although bed load velocities are key for understanding fluctuations in transport rates, existing models have not accounted for the full range of observations. Here, we present a generalized Langevin model of particle transport that includes turbulent drag and episodic particle-bed collisions. By means of analytical calculations, we demonstrate that momentum dissipation by particle-bed collisions controls the form of the bed load velocity distribution. As collisions vary between elastic and inelastic, the velocity distribution interpolates between normal and exponential. These results add context to conflicting experiments on bed load velocities and suggest that granular interactions regulate sediment dynamics and transport rate fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→