MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157859237

지식재산 분야의 대체적 분쟁해결제도에서 온라인 분쟁해결절차의 도입방안

2021· article· ko· W3157859237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLAW & TECHNOLOGY · 2021
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDispute Resolution and Class Actions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOnline dispute resolutionIntellectual propertyArbitrationAlternative dispute resolutionDispute resolutionMediationDispute mechanismDispute boardLaw and economicsSettlement (finance)LawAgency (philosophy)BusinessPolitical scienceNegotiationSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is difficult to resolve disputes over intellectual property rights quickly and efficiently using traditional litigation procedures alone. Therefore, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, that can lead to quick and comprehensive conclusions without regional restrictions, can be an appropriate means for resolving intellectual property disputes. However, the alternative dispute resolution system in the field of intellectual property is not very active. There are two reasons for inactivation. First, in spite of the international nature of disputes over intellectual property rights and the recent COVID-19 incident, the alternative dispute resolution system in the domestic intellectual property field basically requires attendance at the mediation date. Second, although disputes over intellectual property rights will often target multiple intellectual property rights, the current alternative dispute settlement system in the field of intellectual property in Korea is divided into fragments of organizations responsible for dispute resolution by intellectual property rights. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a full-scale online dispute resolution process and to integrate alternatively divided dispute resolution procedures. The alternative dispute resolution system unique to the field of intellectual property is led by an administrative agency. But the committees belonging to the administrative agency, such as The Industrial Property Dispute Resolution Committee, The Korean Copyright Commission, only accept some online mediation applications, and most don’t have online dispute settlement procedures. Meanwhile, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center provides eADR services for online dispute resolution procedures, and the US Smartsettle program provides online dispute resolution procedures in the private sector, and Canadian Civil Resolution Tribunal conducts online trial for a minor cases. With reference to such foreign cases as above, an integrated online dispute resolution procedure platform should be prepared. Considering the time and cost, it is possible to consider how to utilize the Korean court electronic litigation program. The parties apply for mediation through the above program, and the committee belonging to the administrative agency proceeds with the mediation procedure in the above program in accordance with the procedure. On the other hand, about the introduction of artificial intelligence technology, Weak AI, which investigates, collects, and analyzes big data on a specific topic, will need to be utilized, which will need to be monitored for future technology development and conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it