Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is difficult to resolve disputes over intellectual property rights quickly and efficiently using traditional litigation procedures alone. Therefore, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, that can lead to quick and comprehensive conclusions without regional restrictions, can be an appropriate means for resolving intellectual property disputes. However, the alternative dispute resolution system in the field of intellectual property is not very active. There are two reasons for inactivation. First, in spite of the international nature of disputes over intellectual property rights and the recent COVID-19 incident, the alternative dispute resolution system in the domestic intellectual property field basically requires attendance at the mediation date. Second, although disputes over intellectual property rights will often target multiple intellectual property rights, the current alternative dispute settlement system in the field of intellectual property in Korea is divided into fragments of organizations responsible for dispute resolution by intellectual property rights. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a full-scale online dispute resolution process and to integrate alternatively divided dispute resolution procedures. The alternative dispute resolution system unique to the field of intellectual property is led by an administrative agency. But the committees belonging to the administrative agency, such as The Industrial Property Dispute Resolution Committee, The Korean Copyright Commission, only accept some online mediation applications, and most don’t have online dispute settlement procedures. Meanwhile, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center provides eADR services for online dispute resolution procedures, and the US Smartsettle program provides online dispute resolution procedures in the private sector, and Canadian Civil Resolution Tribunal conducts online trial for a minor cases. With reference to such foreign cases as above, an integrated online dispute resolution procedure platform should be prepared. Considering the time and cost, it is possible to consider how to utilize the Korean court electronic litigation program. The parties apply for mediation through the above program, and the committee belonging to the administrative agency proceeds with the mediation procedure in the above program in accordance with the procedure. On the other hand, about the introduction of artificial intelligence technology, Weak AI, which investigates, collects, and analyzes big data on a specific topic, will need to be utilized, which will need to be monitored for future technology development and conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".