지식재산 분야의 대체적 분쟁해결제도에서 온라인 분쟁해결절차의 도입방안
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is difficult to resolve disputes over intellectual property rights quickly and efficiently using traditional litigation procedures alone. Therefore, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, that can lead to quick and comprehensive conclusions without regional restrictions, can be an appropriate means for resolving intellectual property disputes. However, the alternative dispute resolution system in the field of intellectual property is not very active. There are two reasons for inactivation. First, in spite of the international nature of disputes over intellectual property rights and the recent COVID-19 incident, the alternative dispute resolution system in the domestic intellectual property field basically requires attendance at the mediation date. Second, although disputes over intellectual property rights will often target multiple intellectual property rights, the current alternative dispute settlement system in the field of intellectual property in Korea is divided into fragments of organizations responsible for dispute resolution by intellectual property rights. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a full-scale online dispute resolution process and to integrate alternatively divided dispute resolution procedures. The alternative dispute resolution system unique to the field of intellectual property is led by an administrative agency. But the committees belonging to the administrative agency, such as The Industrial Property Dispute Resolution Committee, The Korean Copyright Commission, only accept some online mediation applications, and most don’t have online dispute settlement procedures. Meanwhile, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center provides eADR services for online dispute resolution procedures, and the US Smartsettle program provides online dispute resolution procedures in the private sector, and Canadian Civil Resolution Tribunal conducts online trial for a minor cases. With reference to such foreign cases as above, an integrated online dispute resolution procedure platform should be prepared. Considering the time and cost, it is possible to consider how to utilize the Korean court electronic litigation program. The parties apply for mediation through the above program, and the committee belonging to the administrative agency proceeds with the mediation procedure in the above program in accordance with the procedure. On the other hand, about the introduction of artificial intelligence technology, Weak AI, which investigates, collects, and analyzes big data on a specific topic, will need to be utilized, which will need to be monitored for future technology development and conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle