MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157866779 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.013

Return to Work Among Young Adult Survivors of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States

2021· article· en· W3157866779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesOffice of Naval ResearchLegend BiotechPharmacyclicsTakeda OncologySanofi GenzymeMerck Sharp and DohmeU.S. Public Health ServiceGenentechHealth Resources and Services AdministrationNational Institutes of HealthAstellas PharmaKite PharmaMeiji Seika PharmaDaiichi-SankyoVertex PharmaceuticalsOmeros CorporationPfizerIncyteKiadis Pharmabluebird bioKyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical DevelopmentNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesAngiocrine BioscienceCancer MoonshotMedical College of WisconsinStemCyteBristol-Myers SquibbCSL BehringNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCelgeneActinium PharmaceuticalsDaiichi Sankyo EuropeNational Cancer InstituteServierGilead SciencesAbbVieMoonshot Research and Development ProgramSanofiAmgenJazz PharmaceuticalsIntel CorporationAstellas Pharma US
KeywordsMedicinePsychosocialTransplantationHematopoietic cellConfidence intervalYoung adultOdds ratioPopulationComorbidityLogistic regressionGerontologyInternal medicinePsychiatryHaematopoiesisStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it