MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157896509 · doi:10.1080/23249935.2021.1921879

Framework for development of the Scheduler for Activities, Locations, and Travel (SALT) model

2021· article· en· W3157896509 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammad Hesam Hafezi, Naznin Sultana Daisy, Hugh Millward, Lei Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportmetrica A Transport Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReplicateScheduling (production processes)Travel behaviorComputer scienceSample (material)Econometric modelSurvey data collectionControl (management)Travel timeOperations researchEconometricsTransport engineeringMachine learningEconomicsStatisticsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the travel behavior of individuals grouped by similar time-use activity patterns can contribute greatly to modeling regional spatial and temporal patterns of transport demand. In this paper, we present a comprehensive modeling framework to forecast and replicate individuals’ travel behavior, labeled as the Scheduler for Activities, Locations, and Travel (SALT). The prototype version of the SALT framework comprises a series of modules that employ behaviorally-based econometric, machine-learning, and data-mining techniques. The SALT model is cross-validated with 30% of the out-of-home sample survey data from the large Halifax Space Time Activity Research (STAR) household survey. Results show that the SALT scheduling model is able to assemble the travelers’ 24-hour schedules with an average 82% accuracy compared to the observed data. The proposed simulation modeling framework is useful for deeper understanding of individuals’ activity-travel decisions and may be utilized to examine sensitive policy issues such as transportation control measures and congestion-pricing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportmetrica A Transport ScienceSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207