MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157897978

ОСОБИСТІСНА ІДЕНТИЧНІСТЬ ЯК ЧИННИК ФОРМУВАННЯ ІНТЕЛЕКТУАЛЬНОЇ БІОГРАФІЇ: УКРАЇНСЬКА СКЛАДОВА ШЕКСПІРОЗНАВЧОГО ДОРОБКУ ІРИНИ МАКАРИК

2019· article· uk· W3157897978 on OpenAlex
Nataliya Torkut

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueНаукові праці. Філологія. Літературознавство · 2019
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUkrainian Cultural and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianDiasporaHomelandSociologyIdentity (music)Context (archaeology)AppropriationScholarshipIdeologyLiteratureAestheticsHistoryPoliticsEpistemologyGender studiesPolitical scienceLawLinguisticsPhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is aimed at the analytical explication of the Ukrainian segment in the Shakespearean scholarship of Irena Makaryk, a well-known Canadian researcher of the Ukrainian origin. The academic novelty of the research is determined by the fact that her literature and theater studies are examined in correlation with the range of problems of identity and modern diaspora discourse. The axiological genesis of Irena Makaryk as a representative of the second generation of the Ukrainian emigrants has been developing in the context of her family history and the Ukrainian diaspora environment that is a nationally conscious and active one. These factors greatly influenced her academic priorities and the formation of her methodological paradigm. An acquaintance with the scholar‟s intellectual biography and works proves that her personality identity that combines Canadian and Ukrainian parts in nonconflicting unity includes the high estimation of genetic affinity with Ukraine as the native land of her parents, sympathetic attitude toward it, a deep knowledge of its history and culture and an excellent command of Ukrainian language. The characteristic features of her Shakespearean works are interdisciplinarity and taking into account the complicated interplay of mentality, ideology, and cultural politics.Irena Makaryk‟s research on different aspects of Shakespeare appropriation in Ukraine distinctly exhibits three thematic dominants that give rise to three topical directions. The first one, that focuses on the reception of the Bard‟s dramatic method and works by Taras Shevchenko and Lesya Ukrainka, discovers the ontological and aesthetic foundations as well as the character of the creative dialogue the famous Ukrainian poets carried on with the English genius. The second direction highlights the specificity of the Hamletian discourse in Ukrainian culture of the early Soviet period (poetry of M. Rylsky, M. Bazhan, E. Pluzhnik) and during the Second World War (the first Ukrainian production of Hamlet in Lviv in 1943). Irena Makaryk reveals colonial and totalitarian pressure on the art community and brings to light its hidden mechanisms. The third direction of the Ukrainian-centered Shakespearean studies of Irena Makaryk, aimed at reconstructing the life experience of producing Shakespeare on the Ukrainian stage of the 1920s and 1930s, demonstrates a wide range of using Shakespeare for various socio-cultural purposes and/or ideological demands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it