MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157913319 · doi:10.7202/1075993ar

Entre conservatisme et rectitude politique en enseignement supérieur : un commentaire critique sur The coddling of the American mind

2021· article· fr· W3157913319 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Guillaume Loignon, Sébastien Béland

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Freedom and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le livre The coddling of the American mind , par Greg Lukianoff et Jonathan Haidt, a généré beaucoup d’intérêt depuis sa sortie. Nous en proposons une recension critique qui situe d’abord l’ouvrage dans son contexte sociopolitique, puis en résume les idées centrales. Nous présentons ensuite une critique qui s’est concentrée sur les choix et fondements théoriques qui sous-tendent l’ouvrage, puis en évaluons une des propositions centrales, celle d’instaurer un système de discrimination positive envers les professeur⋅e⋅s ayant un alignement politique conservateur. Enfin, nous revenons sur les aspects du livre que nous avons trouvés intéressants et discutons de son utilisation potentielle en classe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicAcademic Freedom and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207