Privacy-Preserving Aggregation for Federated Learning-Based Navigation in Vehicular Fog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning-based automotive navigation has recently received considerable attention, as it can potentially address the issue of weak global positioning system (GPS) signals under severe blockages, such as in downtowns and tunnels. Specifically, the data-driven navigation framework combines the position estimation offered by the high-sampling inertial measurement units and the position calibration provided by the low-sampling GPS signals. Despite its promise, the privacy preservation and flexibility of the participating users in the federated learning process are still problematic. To address these challenges, in this article, we propose an efficient, flexible, and privacy-preserving model aggregation scheme under a federated learning-based navigation framework named FedLoc. Specifically, our proposed scheme efficiently protects the locally trained model updates, flexibly supports the fluctuation of participants, and is robust against unregistered malicious users by exploiting a homomorphic threshold cryptosystem, together with the bounded Laplace mechanism and the skip list. We perform a detailed security analysis to demonstrate the security properties in terms of privacy preservation and dishonest user detection. In addition, we evaluate and compare the computational efficiency with two traditional schemes, and the simulation results show that our scheme greatly improves the computational efficiency during participant fluctuation. To validate the effectiveness of our scheme, we also show that only part of the model update is excluded from aggregation in the case of a dishonest user.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".